Naloxone – what the new legislation changes mean

Kate Halliday, SMMGP Programme Lead, discusses the recent legislation changes which make naloxone more readily available for those that need it.

Naloxone counteracts the effects of opioid overdose and while its distribution to current and past drug users has been encouraged in England there has been a patchy uptake of the drug. Many of us have been waiting for the 1st October 2015 when the Human Medicines Act legislation changes came into force to give more options for the distribution of naloxone (see explanatory memorandum from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). Recent statistics showing a large increase in drug related deaths has only sharpened the desire to increase accessibility of naloxone for opioid users and those in contact with them.

Why has the legislation changed?

Prior to 1st October 2015 naloxone was supplied under prescription, often by patient group directions (PGD) by nurses pharmacists and doctors within drug treatment agencies. Naloxone could be supplied to those:

  • currently using illicit opiates, such as heroin
  • receiving opioid substitution therapy
  • leaving prison with a history of opioid use
  • who had previously used opiate drugs (to protect in the event of relapse)
  • With the agreement of the individual at risk it could also be prescribed to, family members friends and peers.

Whilst this system has led to a great deal of naloxone being distributed in many areas there is a recognition that there were also barriers for many people who were willing and likely to use naloxone from receiving it. For example hostel managers, organisations that provide services for people who are in contact with drug users (e.g. homelessness projects) and family members and carers who for a variety of reasons may not have gained consent from their loved ones could not access naloxone despite the fact that they were clearly in situations which they may use the medication to save a life. There were also structural problems in many services which acted as barriers to dispensing naloxone: some areas had not yet got PGDs in place, and where they did exist the pressure was often on precious nurse time to dispense the medication to individuals, and systems were not always as responsive as they could have been.

What do the changes mean?

There are two main changes the new legislation has brought about. Firstly, anybody employed by agencies providing drug treatment – and not just nurses/doctors – can supply naloxone meaning that it can be distributed by a much wider group of people working in services. Secondly, naloxone can be supplied by agencies providing drug treatment to anyone in the course of lawful drug treatment services where required for the purpose of saving life in an emergency. In other words, named hostel managers and managers of projects which drug users are likely to use, and family, friends and carers of drug users may now have access to naloxone where it is assessed appropriate.

What needs to be in place to implement the changes?

If it has not been done so already, get a policy agreed locally that reflects the changes in legislation. We are grateful to Inclusion for letting us share an example of what a policy can look like that can be adapted to local requirements.

For many drug services the governance will come via the systems that oversee the overall clinical governance for medical services – but this does not have to be the case. The governance can go through social care/voluntary agency structures as long as the agency is providing drug treatment to individuals – consultation with clinical/medical teams should be part of this process.

Don’t forget that SMMGP’s free e-learning module Naloxone Saves Lives can support local training programmes that are set up.

If you do not have one already, set up a naloxone action group to coordinate the implementation across your area. Have you considered all the hostels and agencies in your area who are in contact with drug users that may benefit from having naloxone? Get a strategy for reaching carers in your area who may be interested in having naloxone. Is there a way you can improve naloxone distribution to hard-to-reach groups in your area?

These are exciting times for those of us who have been trying to increase distribution of naloxone to at risk groups; many of the barriers to distributing the medication have now fallen away. It’s up to us to make this legislation work!

Further reading and information

Public Health England have provided information about the effects of the change in legislation.

– Kate Halliday
SMMGP Programme Lead

One thought on “Naloxone – what the new legislation changes mean

  1. Thanks for this. Really clear and helpful. The new legislation is a huge step towards wider distribution and was a long time coming. Its unfortunate that with all the positive momentum there wasn’t some National body endorsing and ‘enforcing’ the policy change to a degree rather than it just ‘allowing’ wider access. Unfortunately, and I do admit its early to ascertain, but feedback would suggest that there is very little change in pre-October status. Given that the ‘suggested’ guidelines from PHE in February highlighted steps to be taken prior to October first, it seems a high number of local authorities have set this as a start date for preparation rather than a deadline. This doesn’t install much faith in suggestions being taken as seriously as they should be in light of the sad statistical data that would demand immediate action were it any other public health issue. 26,000 plus individuals is a lot to lose since 2002!!

    I do like the,simplicity of the Inclusion model. Again cutting through the red tape, eliminating any potential barriers and working on suggestions as if they were already NHS standard operational procedure. The clarity and simplicity of the model, in my opinion, makes it almost pointless for any other specified commissioned service to respond with any negative ‘but…’ answers. There is absolutely no reason whatsoever that this informal but effective governance cant be adopted by ‘all’ services now in a position to supply. I fir one will be incorporating this into any future correspondance I have on the matter. Almost as easy as (Dr) ABC.

    Well dine Inclusion, setting the standards and casting the shadows.

    Its now that we will find out exactly which providers truly do have the health and wellbeing of their clients at the heart of everything they do. Which areas are still person centred on their approach and value their stakeholders rather than treating.them as a commodity or collateral in a war for stats.

Comments are closed.